Okay, I hate the Barbri question writers.
For example:
#28; Ken and his 1957 Chevy. The facts state that Ken made an offer to George, and then Ken revoked it. The question asks what "best describes the agreement b/w Ken and George?" Well, there WAS an offer, but then it was REVOKED, so there is NO agreement whatsoever, now is there? And what is the answer? An offer for a unilateral contract. 'Fraid not--the facts state that that offer was revoked. Or is the question asking us to magically go back in time?
No comments:
Post a Comment